Monday, August 3, 2015

 
SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG WITH MY PHONE
 
 
This is the excuse people use when:
 
  1. They purposely ignore your calls.
  2. They failed to call when they told you they would.
  3. Do not wish to be bothered by....
  4. They cannot think of a lie to tell at the moment of inquiry.
  5. They are around a person or people that they don't want to hear them talking to you.
  6. They are doing something they should not be doing; with someone they're not suppose to be with; or they don't want you to know where they are and what they're doing.
  7. Etc.
 
Some people will go as far to tell you:
  1. "I didn't get any missed calls from you." (We know this is a lie: Missed Calls always show.)
  2. "I called you; the call went straight to voicemail. (This is a lie because your phone was on and continued to ring until voicemail kicks in.)
  3. "My phone was off." (Lie! When phone is on its rings more than once. When phone is off it goes straight to voicemail.)
  4. "I don't know how your number got on my blocked list..." (Lie Alert: Contact numbers do not automatically end up blocked. A contact number has to be selected; the block command must be selected; and when a call is received from a blocked phone number, your phone will let you know.)
  5. "I didn't send you to voicemail." (Lie! When a recipient receives your you will hear it ringing, and if the call suddenly goes to voicemail, that person "ignored" your call by sending you to voicemail. The call did not drop due to technical difficulties--if it did so, you would have received an electronic beep, beep, beep at minimum.)
  6. "I didn't see your text." (More than likely they are telling a lie because most people are constantly looking at their phones doing or another with/to it. So they saw your text.)
  7. "My ringer was off....I didn't know you called." (Okay. Maybe it was, but the phone receiver symbol showed how many calls you received--as did your message symbol for text messages and voicemails, etc. Rarely do people not look at their phones when they ring or vibrate.)
  8. "I couldn't answer when you called because...." (Okay. But you could have called back.)
  9.  "I had no juice in my phone." (Okay. Listen up: If your phone was out of juice, it would have been off and they call would have gone straight to voicemail, idiot!)
  10. "I couldn't find my phone." (Okay. When you found it, why didn't you call back?)
Isn't it amazing that people will tell you: "Something must be wrong with my phone."   All of us are keenly astute regarding the function of cell phone technology and people should stop telling the ridiculous above-referenced lies. Be straight-up. Tell the complainer this: "I didn't want to talk to you...at the time."



Saturday, June 21, 2014

How to Hurt Your Hateful Pisces: Rid Yourself of Pisces

All of my Pisces--the ones that use to be or are [currently] trying to be a part of my life are exactly as I've described them in my previous/most popular post "All Of My Pisces Are Dangerous..." And I will never back-off on what I've said about [all of my] Pisces.

I've heard from many Pisces who were extremely outraged by what I've said about the Pisces in my life--of course they took what I said personally because "the shoe fits" them as well. Believe me: These responders were nasty--really nasty just like Pisces I know really are. I responded to some and told them I'll pray for them.

However, I've heard from many Pisces who were exceptionally honest about and accepting of the traits/behavior(s) I've described re: Pisces. They acknowledged that they have all the traits I've disclosed about this "fishy" sign, and asked me how to end their behaviors. I recommended they seek counseling, i.e., including clinical mental health evaluation.

Many people ask me: "How do I get rid of the Pisces in my life? How can I hurt the Pisces in my life (because they've hurt me so badly)? I want revenge for what they've done to me. What should I do?, etc.

The absolute, irrefutable ways to get revenge against the Pisces that hurt you is to say "No" to them and really stick to it; expose them by telling everyone that knows them what [your] Pisces has done, is capable of, and they are pathological liars; call them out at the exact moment they try to manipulate, twist the facts, or flip-the-script on you; do not argue with them--put them on blast then put them out, or leave the premises yourself/immediately. And most importantly: eliminate them from your life permanently. Never respond to their calls, texts, emails, on-site rants--do not respond to them, ever again.  (Read my blog post "Pisces Hates Love. Pisces Hates Rejection...") When a Pisces recognizes that they have been isolated and eliminated, or otherwise completely ignored, they become devastated--nothing hurts them more than being permanently eliminated from the life or lives of the individual(s) they [use to] control, manipulate, abuse, deceive, pretend to love, and ultimately destroyed. And after you turn your back on them, forgive them then NEVER, EVER ALLOW THEM BACK INTO YOUR LIFE! EVER!

Every Pisces in my family have absolutely no friends; their kids absolutely hate them because all of them have been violently abused by their Pisces parent(s)--emotionally, verbally, and worst of all, physically; and all of my Pisces are without mates. And what is really funny--really, really funny to watch--is how my Pisces will go on a campaign to win back the very people they have hurt and destroyed. But my family DO NOT ACCEPT or ASSOCIATED with [our] Pisces any longer--absolutely none of them.

Like I said: If you want to hurt your Pisces, ignore them, eliminate them from your life--permanently. NEVER TALK TO THEM. NEVER GIVE THEM AN AUDIENCE. If you see your Pisces in an emergency situation--call 911 for them but DO NOT GET INVOLVED.

Saishe's best advice. Tried, tested, and true.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Aries: The Ram! Straight Fire! Ruled By Mars

Yes in-deedy! Aries is the first sign of the "Zodiac;" is a straight-up, without a doubt "fire" sign. The ruling planet of Aries is Mars--the "war" planet; as well as Pluto--the dark planet of the mysterious, metaphysical, and underworld.

It is said that with Aries, war is the chosen first-line of defense. But not so--fast--with Aries. "War" is actually the last line of defense with Aries. Aries result to a "war defense" only when everything else has been explored, tried, and failed to resolve a situation/achieve a "happy medium." The true nature of Aries is to love (truly love), laugh, and enlighten.

The RAM: Means Aries use their heads (logic) in every situation. If "it" is not logical, Aries will naturally reject "it" and seek to create an atmosphere/time to comprehend "it." If "it" is confrontational, Aries will seek to calm "it." If "it" is untruthful, Aries will immediately/on-the-spot let "it" be known that honesty is not being presented. If "it" attacks the weak or unknowing, Aries will rise to defend them.

Aries are thought of as being "bossy." And they are! Why? Because Aries are conscientious by nature. Aries are "fearless" and selfless. Aries are "protectors" of all that is good in the interest of mankind. Aries genuinely care about the safety and well-being of others, and are profoundly sensitive to danger or situations that are detrimental to one's existence. Aries are capable of detecting danger long before its arrival, and will take the lead to deter or avoid it.

Aries honestly care more about others than they do about themselves--which is sometimes detrimenal to their own existence. Aries are not hesitant about or afraid to say exactly what needs to be said when it needs to be said. Aries generally will come right out and say what most people only dream of saying--and they'll tell you why they are saying it. If a person has the audacity to "come up with it," Aries has the immediate audacity to "come out with it." There are no shades of gray with Aries. It's either "black" or "white;" up or down; and never side-ways.

Typically, Aries are honest to a fault--which causes many problems for them. The honesty of Aries is often misunderstood; or considered "confrontational." Most people reject Aries' advice and honesty because 99.9% of the time their advice and honesty is "on point," and most people cannot handle the truth or dislike what they perceive as "being told what to do."

Aries are full of opinions--especially when they notice something unfavorable about to take place. When a situation like this arise, the Aries individual (the "gate keerper") is already there waiting to foil an offense or block its entry or success--by any means necessary.

Typically, Aries are truly "forgiving" and are extremely quick to forgive. Aries do not hold grudges even after they've been "dogged" beyond human comprehension many, many, many times. They will continue to be good to you, help you, and fight your battles--for eons. But when an Aries turns against you, they walk-away from you for life, and they honestly believe everyone on earth is suppose to cut-you-off for life because they know they went further and stayed longer than anyone else you know to help and love you. After you lose the love and support of an Aries, you've lost a friend for life; they believe you deserve no additional dispensation (special consideration)--not even from [your] God. After an Aries cut you off for life, they will continue to respect you, but you will never be permitted to pretend--especially in the presence of others--that "all is good" with you and them because Aries will expose and warn you--in a manner you've never, ever witnessed from them before. Aries are absolutely unpretentious by nature.

Aries typically are loners, and most will tell you they "do not have any friends." Why? Because most Aries--through experience--discover/recognize that generally people have absolutely no concept of what a true friend is. Aries' concept of friendship is love, honor, and commitment, and most people ultimately end-up demonstrating a lack of appreciation and respect for such qualities of friendship. Most Aries know how to be and are sincere practitioners of being a geniune friend. Aries' stratospheric-level of generosity is unsurpassed by none. There is no other sign in the Zodiac as generous or more generous than Aries--NONE! Aries will do anything for you anytime/anyplace, give you everything you need and desire, and take you to places where you fear going alone. "Giving" and "doing" is first-nature to Aries.

And when an Aries deem themself to be your friend, they will [help] lift your burdens and make your wildest dreams come true, especially with the generosity of their time, knowledge, money, and human resources--outer space isn't even the limit. Most people--because it is human nature to do so--become suspicious of the limitless generosity of an Aries. Aries' generosity is mind-boggling--it's scarey--because the average individual will never give what an Aries frequently gives, or do for another person what an Aries will do.

The FIRE: This trait does not necessarily represent being "hot-headed" or temperamental (explosive). The "fire" in Aries represents warmth--the fuzzy kind. The "fire" is truly representative of Aries' passion for life.

But on the flip-side, the "fire" can be representative of the force an Aries individual is capable of exerting in defense of the principles that shape and governs their life, as well as any and everything they love, honor, and cherish, especially their integrity or children. Go after the integrity of an Aries and you, without a doubt, will have hell-to-pay.

Typically, an Aries does not have a “cut-off-switch,” and they will tell you that as a fair warning. If you fail to take heed, the Aries will acknowledge your failure to take heed as a “green light” (your personal okay) to be reprimanded by any means necessary.

An Aries will stop at nothing to destroy your entire understanding of life and liberty, and will not hide while engaging beyond belief tactics to alter your psychological well-being. When it becomes necessary for an Aries to "defend," "Mars" kicks-in and the "war" is on and popping, rock'n, and it won't be stopping until the "threat" is eliminated. Physically hurting a child qualifies an individual for death in the eyes of an Aries. Every sign in the Zodiac feel they will kill to protect a child or children--all signs possess this natural instinct--but an Aries is the astrological sign that will actually execute on behalf of the children--and proudly so.

So be warned: if you do not want your whole world turned up-side-down and otherwise destroyed--forever, never, ever provoke an Aries by more-than-a-few-times transgressing those/that which they love, honor and cherish, or their "values."

Aries individuals are romantics in every sense or definition of a “romantic.” They have a utopian (unrealistic) concept of family, life, love, and friendship. Aries are “mouthy,” with a flare for humor. They are classic examples of making lemonade out of the lemons that life hands to them, and will make you laugh about the horrible things that happens to them. Aries possess an instant disdain for underhandedness. Betrayal is a definite taboo with Aries.

Aries also possess a healthy respect for nature and animals. Aries love infrastructure, architeture, old cars, and beautiful displays of natural resources. Aries are intimidated by massive bodies of water, yet cherish their inter-relationships to the sun, moon, clouds, wind, and shores. Magnificent beauty as provided by nature is the ultimate display of Gods work as far as Aries are concerned. They are quicker than Aquarians at spotting spectacular beauty in nature. Aries are naturally attracted to beauty.

Aries are basically selfless individuals; quick to defend the underdog or downtrodden; fearing nothing and no one. They believe that everyone should be able to “live on the mountaintop,” but have absolutely no problem with or hesitation about kicking a selfish offender over the edge of the mountain if/when it becomes necessary to protect the “lot.”

Aries have a built-in radar for what is real or fake, truth and lies, and undercurrents that most people are incapable of picking up on; as well as a natural proclivity for “sounding the alarm.” Typically most Aries are not back-stabbers. Rather they tell "you" to your face; and banish "back-stabbers" from the presence and life when necessary.

Family is extremely important to Aries. They are obsessed with the belief that family is suppose to always be together, as well as love and protect each other; be there for each other during the good times and the bad times; and are consistent practitioners of "your children are my children." However, if there is a “bad apple” in the family, you can count on Aries to expose them and issue a stern directive for that individual to stay a safe distance away from “the family” forever.

Aries’ first preference is to love and protect you against the world and yourself, as well as tell you what you need to know, and not necessarily what you want to hear.

Aries, although courageous and strong, possess a child-like quality, i.e., they are naive as they believe that if they are good to you, and never hurt you or bring any "issues" to you, then you should never want to disrespect, disregard, or otherwise betray or hurt them. Aries absolutely cannot grasp anyone wanting to hurt them. An Aries being emotionally or physically harmed is simply unacceptable.

Aries also take people literally for what they say. Although Aries are quick-witted, intelligent, and extremely articulate, their naive quality is honed to the "literal" sense of situations and conversations. You must say exactly what you mean to an Aries because an Aries is going to interpret the "literal" meaning of every word you say to them; and they are not too receptive to someone telling them: "Well, that's not what I meant!" Aries' response is: "Well that is what you said." So select your words and positions very carefully with an Aries because they are listening and they really "hear" what you are saying--literally.

For example, a relative who once owned a restaurant and bar, where people often held private parties asked another Aries relative to wait-tables for a private party. It was the Aries relative's very first time being a waitress. At the onset of the party, two tables of guest arrived. One of the tables was a rather large round table (with a huge rod-iron base) where 6 people were seated. The Aries first-time waitress was instructed by the owner to "go and get that table." The Aries waitress walked over and greeted the guest at the table, then said: "Can you all stand-up for a moment, I gotta get this table." Taking the owner's instruction in its literal sense, the Aries waitress began dragging the table across the floor (about 10 feet) over to the bar. The owner was preoccupied at the other end of the bar serving drinks and didn't notice or hear the sound of the table being drug across the floor. When the Aries waitress lined the table up against the bar, she asked the owner. "What do you want me to do with this table?" The owner leaned over the bar and saw the table lined-up against the bar and snapped, "I didn't tell you to go and get the "f...ing" table! The Aries waitress replied: "Yes you did! You told me to go and get the table!" The owner, in buck-eyed amazement stared at her Aries relative for about 30 seconds, then snapped pointing towards the door saying to her Aries relative, "Get the f... out, you stupid "B;" get your stupid-a.. out of here! The Aries waitress was dumb-founded and hurt. She was confused. She shouted: "I did what you told me to do!" (Meanwhile, everyone was laughing histerically.) The owner snapped again: "B...., I meant go and take their order for drinks--not get the f...ing table and bring it over here!"

Aries are wired to "anticipate," and often use this trait to avoid undesirable people and situations. When an Aries "abandon ship" it is really time to go. Aries truly knows when to "hold them" and when to "fold them"--as well as why.

Love and laughter is second-nature to Aries. The only thing Aries love more than laughing and having fun is making other people happy by doing whatever is necessary to make that happen.

There are three (3)categories of dominate characteristics of the "Aries" zodiac sign:

Aries: Born March 21st through March 31st
These Aries are straight mentally ill (but in a manner that makes you want to hug them and tell them so). They represent every trait there is associated with this zodiac sign—good, bad, and ugly; but more bad and ugly presents more often than “good.” They are very delusional about relationships and pathological in everything they do—EVERYTHING! They harbor no shame what-so-ever. Everything they engage in is to the extreme of extreme. On the negative side these Aries are “crazy,” “violent,” completely “unstable” in most aspects of their lives, and they live their entire lives mostly in a world of fantasy. On the positive side they are “free-spirited,” “extremely generous, “loyal,” “loving,” and “fiercely protective.”

Aries: Born April 1st through April 10th
These Aries are straight-up violent when pushed beyond their abnormally high-level of tolerance. They are loyal, honest, and brutal in their delivery of what they perceive as “truth.” Aries will fly in the face or up the ass of adversity and injustices, prepared and qualified to due battle against the worst-of-the worst with unbelievable staying-power, using unimaginable tactics. These Aries' commentary is swift and lethal, and they almost never say that they do not mean, i.e., if they say it they really, really mean it. These Aries are quick to say what most people only dream of saying, and say it precisely when it needs to be said to whom it needs to be said to. These Aries prefer relationships with animals over people because animals love unconditionally. They believe animals are superior to human-beings.

Aries: Born April 11th through April 19th
These Aries are truly the ones to watch. They are capable of being loyal only to themselves—and only to you if they want or need something from you; when they get it, you’re “toast.” The women are “men” snatchers, and the men are “women” snatchers. Most of them cannot be trusted around husbands, wives, or significant others. They totally lack moral compasses. Sex, alcohol, and rock-and-roll are in their DNA and are their life-sources for living. While they possess the positive Aries traits mentioned above they rarely engage them; and can be master-deceivers. They possess all of the lethal Aries traits in the worst ways. They are quick to accuse you of what they are actually guilty of, and when they are “caught dirty,” they will try to convince you that you are the “dirty” one. They do not readily trust people because they cannot be trusted. These types of Aries—men and women—are much like the Pisces, and you should always use caution in your dealings or relationships with them. These are the type of Aries that will sell their souls to the devil and yours as well if you allow them to. Most of them are alcoholics, nymphomaniacs, and thieves. They are hard-core, hard-wired attention seekers and will do anything to get it. Most of the Aries in my family and ex-friends born between these specified dates will invite or have sex anywhere with anyone. (Note: I’m not saying all Aries born between April 11th and April 19th are this way. I'm only talking about the ones among my family and [ex-]friends.)

If you are an Aries, I'm sure you recognize the above as being true to your nature. If you are seeking to understand your Aries, I hope the above helps.

I'm just sharing what I know!

Saishe!

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Gangs in Chicago Developed By Preachers, Businessmen, Politicians

Murder,USA: Chicago,Illinois.

Yes, we are extremely embarassed by the rampant shootings and murders here in Chicago. And believe it or not: This is not a "police" problem, i.e., the police are on the front line fighting a losing battle. This is not a government problem: The government (Federal/State/Local)has absolutely no jurisdiction over how people raise their children.

What this is a parenting or lack thereof problem. This is a lack of economic opportunities problem, among many other variables.

But more importantly, this is a cultivated culture problem. This is a problem that was purposely developed, initiated, and managed by an elite menagerie of African-Americans and whites, clergy and business people, and professionals alike, beginning in the 1960's. To support this claim, I offer the following that gives just one example of how the Blackstone Rangers (aka Black P. Stone Nation, El Rukins) were supported by clergymen, businessmen, and corporations in Chicago.

Note: When Mayor Rahm Emanuel recently suggested renaming a major, internationally known street after a minister who had hands on development of gangs and their influence in Chicago, we submitted the following correspondence in opposition, in which will give the world insight as to how gangs were encouraged and coached on how to expand their influence throughout Chicago's African-American communities, as well as communities throughout America:

Dear Mayor Emanuel (09/13/2013):

Please be hereby advised that African-Americans outside of Bishop B. Brazier's church, especially women are opposed to your intent to rename Stony Island Avenue in the name of Bishop Arthur Brazier.

Our opposition is based solely on our solid, irrefutable knowledge of how Bishop Brazier, through his personal leadership, as well as the involvement of his organizations (The Woodlawn Organization, a.k.a. T.W.O. and The Woodlawn Community Development Corporation, a.k.a WCDC) served as an architect in the proliferation of gangs in our communities, beginning in the 20th Ward more than 46 years ago. It is our collective belief that Bishop Brazier does not deserve such an honor as to have an internationally renowned street renamed to his in honor of him.

To support our opposition, we respectfully request that you reference the attached document (see below "May, 1969"), which will verify that Bishop Brazier, early on, failed us, his fellow man, and his community (in and around Stony Island) as a professor of the word of God when he decided to shepherd gang-banging, gun-running, drug-dealing murders, i.e., the Blackstone Rangers (El Rukins, Gangster Disciples) who prey on us and our children on a daily basis. Many of us fought against him back then. The decisions he made back then still to this day epically and horrifically affect how we are currently living. And God knows our children are bearing the brunt of Bishop Brazier's and others' (Preachers, Politicians, Police, and Businessmen)decisions.

Further, Bishop Brazier from 1967 up until his death never lifted his voice or political-might against the gangs, drugs, murder, or any other social vices permeating African-American communities.

We are hereby respectfully requesting that you do not insult us any further by moving forward with renaming Stony Island in the name of a man who does not deserve such an honor. We further request that you do not attempt to hold our elected officials hostage regarding this issue; and

Dear Mayor Emanuel [and Aldermen] 09/16/2013:

As a follow-up to the 09/13/2013 correspondence you received from Black Women for Economic Parity in support of our opposition to Stony Island being renamed to honor Bishop Arthur Brazier, attached herewith is a supporting historical document: The 1978 Audit Report of The Woodlawn Organization/Woodlawn Community Development Corporation prepared by the public accounting and management consulting firm Alexander Grant.

The [attached 50-Page] 1978 audit report discloses The Woodlawn Organization’s complicity, as well as authenticates all charges of operational duplicity made against The Woodlawn Organization in the May 1st, 1969 article written by James Alan McPherson. The information contained within, in concert with the disclosures in Mr. McPherson's documented interviews speaks volumes as to how Bishop Arthur Brazier and his Board of Directors structured, initiated, and managed what appeared to have been a loosely-ran criminal enterprise that served as an anchoring foundation to strengthen the influence of gangs throughout our communities.

Please keep in mind that the aforementioned is just one blatant, God-forsaken example of Bishop Brazier’s sinful social manifestations; and any "good" endeavor he may have performed will never supersede the long-range devastating social impact that his decades-long moral bankruptcy has had on our communities. Bishop Brazier deserves no honors because to this day (September 16th, 2013) our babies are still killing one another more than ever.

Again we ask that you discontinue your course of disregarding and insulting us--the people who are largely responsible for electing you Mayor of Chicago--and do not rename Stony Island in honor of Bishop Arthur Brazier.

Following is a true representation as to how the gangs of today in Chicago were cultivated by African-American clergy and businessmen, civic leaders, and white clergy, white professionals, and white-owned/well-known corporations:

May 1969
Chicago's Blackstone Rangers (I)
Are the Blackstone Rangers a corrupt, exploitive street gang? Or a constructive engine of community black power? This is Part I of a two-part study of the Ranger Nation, the result of six months of research and interviewing.
JAMES ALAN MCPHERSON May 1 1969, 12:00 PM ET
Click here to go to part II of this article.

SOMETIME between 1961 and 1963, according to evidence presented to a Senate subcommittee chaired by John McClellan of Arkansas last July, an unknown number of black young men, who lived in the general area of Sixty-sixth Place and Blackstone Avenue in the Woodlawn area of Chicago's South Side ghetto, organized a street gang. Like most street gangs, it was formed to protect its members from intimidation by other gangs in the South Side area. The most formidable enemy of this new group was a gang called the Devil's Disciples, which claimed part of the neighboring Kenwood area. In the years which followed, the Disciples became the traditional enemies of the Woodlawn youths, who called themselves Blackstone Rangers.

At first the Rangers were interested only in protecting their territory and their membership from attacks and retaliations by the Disciples, but by 1965 there were an estimated 200 of them in the group, and they were breaking with traditional gang patterns. They were organizing in Woodlawn. And this organization caused some public concern, and even fear, because it began during a period of violent rivalry between the Rangers and the Disciples. During these formative stages the Blackstone Rangers seemed to have placed the running feud between the Disciples and themselves secondary to their primary goal: organization. Soon their influence in Woodlawn caused minor, less influential, less powerful gangs to join them. And they came from all over the South Side: the Maniacs, the Four Corners, the Lovers, the V.I.P.'s, the Pythons, the Warlocks, the F.B.I., the Conservatives, the Pharaohs. At present there are anywhere from 3500 to 8000 boys and men who identify with the Blackstone Rangers and who have affixed the Ranger name to the names of their own gangs. Such is the organizational structure and size of the Blackstone Rangers today that they call themselves a Nation. The Ranger Nation is headed by a group of young men called the Main 21. Until 1968 the president of the organization was Eugene "Bull" Hairston, the vice president was Jeff Fort (also called "Angel" and "Black Prince"), and the warlord was George Rose (also called "Watusi" and "Mad Dog"). The Rangers' spiritual leader was Paul "The Preacher" Martin, and the rest of the Main 21 was made up of leaders of the minor gangs who had joined with the Rangers. Each individual gang, it seems, maintained its own organizational structure with its own officers; but collectively all of the gangs made up the Blackstone Nation, which is presently incorporated to do business under the laws of Illinois.

Since the emergence of the Ranger Nation, individual members have been charged with murder, robbery, rape, knifings, extortion of South Side merchants, traffic in narcotics, extortion and intimidation of young children, forced gang membership, and a general history of outright violence, especially against the Disciples who never joined the Rangers. On the other hand, the Ranger Nation has been credited with keeping the South Side of Chicago "cool" during the summer of 1967 and the spring of 1968, following the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King. It has been said that they have kept drugs, alcoholics, prostitutes, and whites hunting for prostitutes out of their neighborhoods. They have also been credited with making genuine attempts to form lasting peace treaties between themselves and the Disciples in order to decrease the level of gang fighting on the South Side. They have been alternately praised and condemned by the national press, their community, the United States Senate, the local police, and Chicago youth organizations to such an extent that, if one depends on the news media for information, it is almost impossible to maintain a consistent opinion of the Blackstone Rangers.

Some of the Chicago papers have been quick to report any charges of violent activity against a Ranger. In newspaper accounts, the name of the gang takes precedence over the individual arrested and charged with crimes. Many of the charges are accurate; many of the young men who identify with the Rangers are guilty of various crimes. But much of the information passed on to the press is shown to have no substance upon thorough investigation. Still, the adverse publicity serves to keep the Chicago communities, both black and white, in a state of apprehension over the Blackstone Ranger organization, as opposed to the individuals in it.

There has been, and presently still is, a cry for a massive police crackdown on the Rangers. To accomplish this, the Chicago Police Department, following a general order issued by former Chicago Superintendent of Police O. W. Wilson, formed the Gang Intelligence Unit in March of 1967 to learn more about the Rangers and to decrease forcibly the level of gang violence in all areas of Chicago generally, and in the South Side area in particular. The stated purpose of the Unit was to eliminate "the antisocial and criminal activities of groups of minors and young adults in the various communities within the city."

IN EARLY June of 1967, The Woodlawn Organization (T.W.O), a grass roots community association made up of one hundred or so block clubs, and civic, religious, and business organizations in the Woodlawn area of the South Side, received a $957, 000 grant from the Office of Economic Opportunity to set up a special kind of youth project in the Woodlawn area. The purpose of the program was to utilize the existing gang structure—the Blackstone Rangers and the Devil's Disciples—as a means of encouraging youth in the gangs as well as non-gang youth to become involved in a pre-employment orientation, motivational project. The project was to include eight hundred out-of-school unemployed youths. And the entire program was to operate through four job-training centers which were to be set up in the home territories of the Rangers and Disciples. Reverend Arthur Brazier, president of The Woodlawn Organization, was responsible for bringing the interest of OEO to the proposed program, which was admitted to be a "high-risk venture."

The money from OEO went directly to The Woodlawn Organization. It did not go through city agencies, although one of the conditions of the grant was that the mayor was to be "invited" to concur in the selection of a project director for the program. There is some opinion that the mayor's office was not pleased with this. In fact, the full operation of the program was delayed over two months because of the inability of the T.W.O. people and Mayor Richard J. Daley to come to an agreement on a director for the program. By the time the program officially began in September, a project director had not been hired, and the Rangers and Disciples had, apparently, lost much of their enthusiasm for the program.

In September of 1967, The Woodlawn Organization opened four training centers in the Woodlawn area: two for the Blackstone Rangers and two for the Devil's Disciples. One of the Ranger Centers was located in the First Presbyterian Church, a church in the Woodlawn area headed by Reverend John Fry, a white Presbyterian clergyman. The Xerox Corporation was hired to formulate the curriculum; the Chicago Urban League was hired to do job development; and Arthur Andersen & Company was hired to give T.W.O. monthly reviews. In addition, a Monitoring Unit with the Chicago police was set up to have two meetings a month with T.W.O. people and representatives from the two gangs, which had attempted to deescalate the level of their violent rivalry since the new program had been announced.

The trainees were paid $45 a week to take five hours of instruction a day for five days a week, in, addition to travel expenses. The instructors in the program, or Center Chiefs, were not professionals but gang leaders who were supposed to be under the supervision of professionals because, as Reverend Brazier stated before the McClellan Committee, "many of these youth do not relate to professionals because the professionals with middle-class attitudes do not relate to them." Eugene Hairston, president of the Rangers, was hired as an assistant project director at a salary of $6500 a year. Jeff Fort, Ranger vice president, became a Center Chief and received $6000 a year. And many of the other members of the Main 21 occupied, at one time or another, salaried positions in the project. Apparently, there was not much public opposition to the hiring of gang leaders by the program. Rather, there seems to have been a reversal in public attitude toward the Rangers because of their performance in the year before the program began.

One of the activities which helped their public image was the production of a musical review called Opportunity Please Knock, which was sponsored by Oscar Brown, Jr., the jazz pianist, and performed by groups of Rangers and students from the Hyde Park High School. The show, which was eventually taken over by the Rangers, ran for six weeks in May and June of 1967. An estimated eight thousand people went to the First Presbyterian Church during the first weeks of its performance, and it received very favorable nationwide publicity. Subsequent performances were given in various suburban communities around Chicago, and parts of the show traveled to Watts to perform. Some members of the troupe appeared on the Smothers Brothers show, and Ebony featured a large color story of the production in its August, 1967, issue.
A second instance of positive Ranger activity, which also gained them favorable publicity, was their willingness to be bussed out of town on August 12, Bud Billiken Day (named for a mythical folk hero created by the Chicago Daily Defender, a black newspaper). All past major conflicts between the Rangers and the Disciples had taken place during the Bud Billiken Day Parade and picnic in the South Side's Washington Park. In 1966 the city of Chicago had financed an out-of-town picnic for the Rangers through the Boys' Club, although there is some evidence that it considered the picnic idea a kind of blackmail exacted by the Rangers. In 1967, however, The Woodlawn Organization requested from OEO permission to use $5000 of its funds to take six hundred Rangers to an out-of-town picnic at Valparaiso University. The Rangers made the decision to leave town, it is said, because of rumors of a brewing riot and the public expectation that they would cause or at least participate in it.

The Ranger vice president, Jeff Fort, had been jailed on July 30 on murder charges and was still in jail on Bud Billiken Day. There are conflicting statements about whether or not Fort threatened to start a riot. Policemen have testified that he stated that if he were arrested, "the city would burn," while other sources reported that he cautioned the Rangers, after his arrest, not to riot. In any case, he remained in jail until early September of 1967, and there was no riot. The Rangers attended their picnic, and there were few incidents during the day. Whether or not the Rangers and Disciples actively contributed to the calm remains an open question. But a safe assumption can be made that when the T.W.O. project began in September, the Blackstone Rangers were enjoying a good deal of favorable press coverage and community support.

A final incident in the fall of 1967 helped their image in the city. In the Kenwood district, which adjoins Woodlawn, the police dispersed a black-power rally on September 15. The crowd then moved to a local high school, where bottles were thrown and two shots were fired by a sniper. The situation seemed to have been too tense for the police, when Herbert Stevens, leader of the Four Corners Rangers and a member of the Main 21 (known as "Thunder"), was said to have stood before the crowd and said, "All you who are willing to die, step up now. Otherwise, let's go home." And as he turned to leave he said, "When I come back, I don't want to see anybody on the streets. I want these streets cleared." When he returned in five minutes, the story goes, the crowd had broken up.

THE Blackstone Rangers wanted to play a major role in determining how the OEO-Woodlawn project should be run, and there were meetings throughout the summer of 1967 between the gang leaders and representatives of T.W.O. to determine the extent of their voice in the project. These meetings were kept under surveillance by detectives from the Gang Intelligence Unit.

The public favor enjoyed by the Rangers during the summer pf 1967 dropped off severely when the president and vice president were arrested in late September for soliciting three juveniles—Marvin Martin, fifteen, Sanders Martin, fourteen, and Dennis Jackson, also fourteen—to murder a narcotics dealer named Leo McClure. McClure was in fact one of three men who were shot. Though he was not, it emerged, the prime target, he was the only one of the three who died. Dennis Jackson was alleged to have done the actual shooting. Hairston, the Ranger president, was kept in jail without bond, and the newspapers printed so many stories about a Teen-age Murder, Inc., and so many details of the case against Hairston, that the first courtroom case ended in a mistrial.

During the same period the activities of Reverend John Fry and the First Presbyterian Church, which served as one of the T.W.O. training centers, were called into question. The church was said to be an arsenal for the Rangers to store their guns and a place where they sold and smoked marijuana, had sexual activity, and held their secret gang meetings. Then Jeff Fort was arrested in October and charged with murdering a Disciple. Both his arrest and the earlier arrest of Hairston encouraged the press to give extensive adverse publicity to The Woodlawn Organization because of their employment by the project. Soon afterward, three of the Main leaders, also members of the T.W.O. staff, were indicted for rape. The detectives of the G.I.U. made extensive visits to the training centers and found, according to their reports, no actual training taking place, the falsification of time sheets, gambling, and evidence that marijuana was being smoked on the premises. Finally, a Disciple was shot in one of the two Disciple Centers with a shotgun. The shooting was said to have been an accident, but the G.I.U. detectives who investigated the shooting found evidence that "light narcotics" (Robitussin) were being used at the Disciple Center. It was about this time that Senator McClellan's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations began to gather evidence in its planned investigation of The Woodlawn Organization's "high-risk" project.
THE investigation began on June 28, 1968, in Washington. There was nationwide television coverage as all those who had connections with the project, official or otherwise, testified before Senators Jacob Javits, Carl Curtis, Fred Harris, Edmund Muskie, Karl Mundt, and of course, Chairman John McClellan, who asked most of the questions.

Reverend Arthur Brazier made a desperate attempt to defend his project, explaining how participation of gang members was necessary for its success and charging that harassment from the Gang Intelligence Unit and explosively adverse news publicity had made it almost impossible for the project to develop as anticipated. Members of the Gang Intelligence Unit testified that they had made extensive visits to the training centers during the period of their operation and had found very little, if any, instruction going on. They also testified to the long list of crimes said to have been committed by gang members while under the sponsorship of T.W.O., especially the murder which was said to have been solicited by Eugene Hairston and Jeff Fort.
Perhaps the most damaging testimony against the program, if not against the Rangers themselves, came from George Rose, a former warlord of the Rangers who had defected from the organization, and a Mrs. Annabelle Martin, a black mother of ten who claimed to have had a very close relationship with the gang. The two Martin boys allegedly solicited by Hairston to commit the murder of Leo McClure were her sons.
Rose testified that the Rangers were involved in the sale of narcotics; that trainees in the program were forced to kick back to the organization from $5 to $25 each week; that the Rangers, from the start, had no interest in job training and that the program was used only to increase the gang's membership and its treasury; and that the First Presbyterian Church and its people—Reverend John Fry, Charles Lapaglia, and Anne Schwalbach, all white—were attempting to control and direct the gang through influence over Jeff Fort.

According to Rose's testimony, Reverend Fry had actually written the proposal for the OEO grant and had turned it over to Reverend Brazier; the church was used for the sale of narcotics, the storage of guns, and a convenient place for the Rangers to engage in sexual activity. He also told the Committee that Lapaglia had taken some of the Main 21 leaders on a trip to Michigan to purchase guns and on another trip to Philadelphia to attend a black-power conference where the murders of certain nonmilitant civil rights leaders were plotted. He said that the Rangers had made it known to Reverend Brazier that they considered the OEO money theirs and would not let outsiders—school dropouts who were not Rangers—into the program And, according to his testimony, Brazier consented to this without informing OEO officials. Rose told the Committee that many of the gang leaders who had been hired as instructors or Center Chiefs had fifth- or sixth-grade educations and that Jeff Fort, who served as a Center Chief, could not read or write. Finally, he stated that students from regular schools were forced to drop out in order to join the program and the gang, and that those who refused were beaten, shot in the arms, forced to keep off the streets, or killed. In this way, he said, the Rangers induced "a couple hundred" students to leave public schools and join the program, and that it was a practice of the Rangers to solicit juveniles to commit murder because they received a lighter sentence if they were caught.

Of special interest was his testimony that the Rangers had offered to help the police, and, in fact, did outfit themselves in black uniforms, called themselves the police of the Blackstone Ranger Nation, policed their neighborhoods, and turned over to the police several non-Rangers in order to clear the name of their organization. He stated that the police accepted them at first, but then, "after we turned a couple of guys in and made it known that they weren't our guys, the police still started cracking our young fellows' heads, just because of the uniforms. They called us storm troopers because we had black jump boots, black pants tucked into. the top of the boots. . . . They didn't like this at all. They called it mob action."
Rose also testified that after the Rangers were rejected by the police, Reverend John Fry advised them to begin extorting merchants. "Since we west being accused of it," he said, "there wasn't anything we could lose by doing it." Rose said that the Rangers got from $5000 to $8000 a week from tavern owners and various sums from shoe stores, clothing stores, food stores, and drugstores through threats of future violence against them. Robert L. Pierson of the Chicago State's Attorney’s Office told the Committee that the Rangers "are the beginning of a Black Mafia." He testified that the Rangers were, in fact, extorting merchants but that the merchants would not complain because of fear of retaliation from the gang. During the April days following the murder of Martin Luther King when the Rangers distributed signs to be displayed in the windows of neighborhood merchants, he said, they charged $50 for their protection.

Jeff Fort, who had assumed leadership of the gang after Hairston was convicted in May of 1968, was subpoenaed to testify before the Committee. He was sworn in but never sat down before Senator McClellan. Marshall Patner, Fort's lawyer, submitted a request that the Committee allow Fort to confront and cross-examine the witnesses who had testified against him. The request was refused by Senator McClellan under authority of the Committee Rules. After a heated exchange between Patner and Senator McClellan during which both the lawyer and Fort were reminded of the possibility of contempt charges if Fort refused to accept protection from the Fifth Amendment and proceed with his testimony, Marshall Patner turned to Fort, still standing beside him, and said: "We really must go." Then they walked out.

Chicago's Blackstone Rangers (II)


Last month Mr. McPherson described how a group of black Chicago street gangs evolved into the controversial "Ranger Nation," funded by the Poverty Program, investigated by the Senate, and hunted by the police. Here he completes his report and explains why—as a onetime Chicago policeman puts it—the Rangers "started as kids, but with all the pressures, they don't even know themselves now."

James Alan McPherson Jun 1 1969, 12:00 PM ET

Few uniformed policemen walk the streets in the Woodlawn area. Those who do are black. Most white policemen drive through the area in cars, usually accompanied by a black officer. Most of the policemen in the area seem to be young. They are, for the most part, polite, and a little cold. On occasion one notices a parked patrol car with two hard-faced white officers in the front seat and the barrel of a shotgun framed in the window between them. Only then does one remember the tension which is supposed to exist between the police and the black community.

It is present, but it is not racial; at least not in the traditional—black-white—sense of the word.

Black people, if Blackstone Rangers can be called representative of black people, feel a tension between black policemen and themselves. It is a feeling of mistrust, of discomfort. Rangers do not seem to be under continual harassment from the police, but it is a fair assumption that they, or at least their leaders, are being watched by other blacks. It one sits too long in a restaurant with a Ranger of any status within the organization, he will eventually become aware of another black sitting in the next booth, sipping an eternal cup of coffee. Perhaps he is merely enjoying his coffee; perhaps he is a plainclothesman on the job. In any case, Rangers find it more relaxing to converse inside the Center or in one of their other meeting places.

"It shouldn't be called the Police Gang Intelligence Unit," says Mickey Cogwell, one of the Main 21 (the leadership of the Blackstone Rangers). "It should be called the Gang Stupid Unit because they are so stupid. If they really wanted to get us, they would wait until we commit crimes and then arrest us. Instead, they try to stop us from doing anything."

Mickey Cogwell is another busy man. Among the Main 21, he is recognized as the Ranger leader with the most business ability. For this reason Ranger president Jeff Fort put him in charge of West Side business operations of the Blackstone Nation. Cogwell is intelligent, and his directness suggests honesty and candor. He wears a black derby and a blue turtleneck sweater and talks very fast. He has had considerable experience with the Gang Intelligence Unit. He has been arrested more than sixty times.

"Every time people do things for us the G.I.U. tries to publicize it so that donators get bad publicity," Cogwell says. "It doesn't want the Rangers and Disciples to have a peace treaty because it threatens the security of their jobs. I feel that the G.I.U.—black men—use the Rangers and the rivalry between us and the D's to make their work more important to the system."

Cogwell believes that the members of the G.I.U. have extra-police powers. According to him, they can go into the Cook County jail whenever they want; they have easy access to the press whenever they want to publicize stories about the Rangers; they have the help of the power structure in Chicago; and they can even influence judges. "Suppose one of the younger cats go out and does something and is put in the Cook County Jail. They will be offered a chance to get out if they swear that they were told to do something by one of the older Rangers, by one of the Main," he says. "The police have realized that they can't break up the Stones now. They might have done it four or five years ago, but now all they can do is arrest the Main. But Stone will still go on. In order to break us up, they will have to arrest everyone from the Main down to the peewees.

"If the police pick up a Stone, we take the number of the car, call a lawyer, and follow the car to the station," Cogwell states. "We wait in the halls until the lawyer comes. Then we try to find out what the bond is. If it's not too high, we try to raise it. But most bonds are set too high." He attributes the high bonds to intervention by members of the G.LU. and the influence they seem to have over judges.

Cogwell denies that there was a payoff behind the November "Don't Vote" campaign. He says that it was an expression of the dissatisfaction of the Rangers with the local political structure. He observes that just after their campaign, G.I.U. chief Edward Buckney was promoted to captain and plans were made to increase the G.I.U. from 38 to 200 men. He believes that the campaign frightened the Chicago power structure. And the Rangers, he says, are now planning for 1971, the year of the next mayoralty election. Winston Moore, the black warden of the Cook County jail and a critic of the Rangers, called the campaign "outright stupid," but whether or not the activity was politically naïve, it seems that the Chicago power structure is presently attempting to tighten up its control of the Blackstone Rangers.

Still, the Rangers appear to be growing, in both number and the scope of their business ventures. Besides the restaurant, they have obtained the use of a building from Humble Oil Company for $1 a year. The building, Co-well says, will be used for Ranger businesses which will be operated by the eight Blackstone Rangers who are presently receiving training from the Chicago Small Businessmen's Association. Also, the Westinghouse Corporation has donated to the Rangers, through the University of Chicago's Firman House, fourteen washers and three dryers. The corporation will teach the Rangers how to operate them so they will be able to start their own laundromat. They have received two car-wash units from other sources, and have been given an interest in the Sammy Davis, Jr. Liquor Store, a pilot project owned by the famous entertainer and managed by the Rangers. The profits from the store go into a "slush fund" against the time when the Rangers are prepared to set up other businesses. Finally, an unnamed manufacturer has supplied them with 20, 000 "All Mighty Black P. Stone" sweat shirts with the phrase "black is beautiful" printed on their backs in every major language. Lamar Bell, a Ranger leader, wears one with the phrase written in Greek.

"We want the Stones to be able to know something when they go into business," Mickey Cogwell says. He is not pleased with his attempts to run the West Side operation, he notes, because of what he calls attempts of the G.I.U. to stop Ranger business development by finding violations of the building and zoning codes, and reporting them to city agencies. At one point, he says, the Rangers had $800 worth of violations against them.

Mickey Cogwell claims that the Rangers made a genuine effort to keep the South Side cool during the April riots. "Jeff sent word out all over the Nation to keep peace," he says, "because King was killed and everybody was hurting. All the Main leaders went out into the streets to keep peace. Plus, the G.I.U. was out too, to provoke the Rangers into rioting. We feel that the city was out to get us to burn down our own community. But since we need the stores—our babies need milk—Jeff decided that all the stores in the area were part of the Ranger Nation."
I asked Mickey Cogwell if the Rangers would like to patrol their neighborhoods as a kind of community police force similar in some respects to the Black Panthers on the West Coast.

"There is quite a difference between the power structure on the West Coast and the power structure in Chicago," he replied. "Mayor Daley is the most powerful man in America. He can tell the President what to do. On the Coast the Panthers can ride around in cars with guns, but not here. Mayor Daley is a powerful cat, very powerful. And dangerous, very dangerous."

While the Rangers can, in many instances, be considered a kind of spontaneous para-police force in their efforts to show the strength of their organization, there is another consideration to place in focus: are the police, specifically the members of the Gang Intelligence Unit, themselves a para-political force? This question is important in a very singular respect. It is evident that the Blackstone Ranger Nation is not interested in voluntarily helping the police: all of their activities which may be called helpful to the police seem to arise, unavoidably, from their efforts to keep the name of the Ranger organization safe from adverse publicity or else to demonstrate the tremendous power and community appeal, at least among the young, of the Blackstone Ranger Nation. In both of these areas the activities of the Gang Intelligence Unit seem to contribute the necessary pressure or motivation. The relative ease with which its members operate within the police department and cooperation they receive from the State's Attorney’s Office and the Cook County jail, the influence they seem to have in the courts, and the easy willingness of the press to publicize incidents about the Rangers all suggest that members of the Unit have more than ordinary police powers.

For example, in December of 1968 after Jeff Fort was found guilty of contempt of Congress and released on $5000 bond, he was arrested by members of the G.I.U. on an old charge: failure to pay a S50 fine for a previous disorderly conduct arrest. The arrest warrant was issued on March 17, 1967. The eight G.I.U. officers who arrested Fort arrived at his home carrying axes, prepared to break down the door. They had no search warrant, but they searched his apartment and found a .22 caliber gun. Fort was charged with failure to register the gun.

Marshall Patner, the white Chicago lawyer who walked out of Senator McClellan's investigation of Poverty Program funding of a Ranger project with his client Jeff Fort last summer, has been in a position which enabled him to observe the activities of the Gang Intelligence Unit firsthand. "The question is," he says, "whether the police run the whole show. The G.I.U. can say 'no bond' to the judges, and no bond is given. Judges listen to them. State's attorneys listen to them."

Patner is paid by the Kettering Foundation to provide legal counsel for Rangers in general and Jeff Fort in particular. A 1956 University of Chicago Law School graduate, he quit his job as head of the appellate and test case division of the Legal Aid Bureau of Chicago to help William W. Brackett, who served as counsel for the Reverend John Fry before the McClellan Committee. Fry is a white clergyman whose church, the First Presbyterian, housed one of the Rangers' training centers funded by the Office of Economic Opportunity through a local grass roots group, The Woodlawn Organization (T.W.O.). The church thought Fort should have a black lawyer, but Fort preferred Marshall Patner.

"As a lawyer," Patner says, "I don't see my function as looking over a client to see what he's doing. I see these people as needing defense because they are being picked on for offenses which other people wouldn't be charged with, and subject to high bond just because they are Rangers." Since the McClellan hearings, Marshall Patner has received angry letters and telephone calls suggesting that he should be put into a concentration camp.

In Ranger cases, according to Patner, the judges set very high bonds. In one arrest for aggravated assault, the night judge set bond at $4000 and the morning judge reset bond at $5000. For a fight in the jail, Fort's bond was set at $10,000, and for a charge of resisting arrest, Jeff Fort's bond was again set at S10, 000. He estimates that Fort has been picked up over one hundred and eighty times. Sometimes he will be arrested, processed, and released in a few minutes. Patner is bringing a suit in federal court for injunctive relief. The suit is against Mayor


Daley, Captain Buckney, the State's Attorney, and certain judges, and is on behalf of Jeff Fort, Mickey Cogwell, and the Black P. Stone Nation.

Marshall Patner feels that the peacekeeping role of the Rangers is a "funny" one. "I would guess that as a matter of defiance and as a show of power Rangers exert all the energy possible to see that police prophecies about them are not fulfilled. In contrast, they do this in areas where interests are common to their own. I believe that they keep a lot of ghetto kids out of trouble by giving them something with which they can identify."

The police are definitely out to get the Stones," Carl Banks, a Ranger teacher, tells me at the Black P. Stone Youth Center, "especially since Nixon got in. Every time a black gets arrested, if he's from this neighborhood he's treated like a Stone. His is bond is hiked up, he's harassed." Banks's voice changes to anger. "They don't want the Stones to have anything." He crushes a cigarette butt with his foot. "They want to keep us right down here on the ground."
"Why do you think they're out to get you?" I ask him.

Banks lights up another cigarette. "Some people in the area are still scared of us. This neighborhood used to be terrible, especially for strangers. Now all that's changed."
"How has it changed?"

"Stone run it," he says. "There's less fighting now. Stones are keeping dope and faggots out of the neighborhood. We even try to keep prostitutes out."

I follow Carl Banks over to the stage where the drums are assembled. It is time for his practice session. We want to represent to the kids that this is our neighborhood," he continues; "we love it, it's all we got. We want the kids to feel the same way. We try to instill some dignity and pride in them. That's what the P. stands for."

"Are the kids forced to join?" I ask.

Carl considers this. He beats out a roll on one of the drums before answering. "It might have been that way in the old days," he admits. "But there's no pressure now. That's why we're going slow now. The older brothers aren't as active as they should be, some of them are drifting away. Having the peewees with us is OK, but we really need the adults to get our program going good."

"How do you get the kids to join?" I ask.

"They just come in," Banks says. "This is the only place open at night for kids to attend. There's nothing else in the area that's open except the Y.M.C.A. on Seventy-first Street."

Black children, at least those from the Woodlawn area, do come to the Center. They wander in and out of the broken door from the time it is unlocked in the morning until after ten every night. Except for the percussion class, there are few organized activities available for them. For the most part, they stand around the office, expectantly, waiting for something to develop; or else they wander back into the main room and sit in the metal chairs against the walls, under the painted faces of Marcus Garvey, Harriet Tubman, Malcolm X, Muhammad All, Martin Luther King, and Frederick Douglass. All of the walls in the main room are painted black. And the historical faces are on the right wall. On the left wall, also against a black background, there is a skillfully drawn mural of cosmic forces, the universe in motion, flaming comets, and the overall suggestion of pure energy.

The wall has its symbolic significance, although the children seem to favor the right side of the room and the faces on its wall, behind the metal chairs where they sit. Young people are only barred from the back room when the older Rangers come in—Jeff Fort, Edward Bey, Mickey Cogwell, and other Main leaders—and secret meetings are held. At these times the children wait in the small office, under orders to remain silent, or else they go outside. And whenever they do leave the Center, many of them, especially the younger ones, are quick to call back to anyone still standing in the room: "Stone Run It!"

Congressman Abner Mikva, a white reformer who has fought the Daley machine, was elected to his first term in Congress last November from the Second Congressional District of Chicago, which encompasses the Woodlawn part of the South Side. He is considered by many people in Chicago to be something of an expert on Ranger affairs. Over coffee in his home on South Kenwood Avenue, Mikva offers some of his impressions of the group.

"I'm not a pro-Ranger. If someone commits a crime in the area and if he is a kid, the victim will assume that lie's a Ranger, but if the Rangers had committed all the crimes they have been charged with, there would probably have to be at least 100, 000 of them, or they would have to be some of the most energetic criminals who ever lived," he says. "I don't think they are civic-minded young reformers. I think that many of them are so alienated that it will be a hard job trying to bring them back into the mainstream. But even if you could bust up the gang structure, it would cost more to keep these kids apart than it would cost to help them do something constructive."

Unlike most groups of young, organized blacks, the Rangers do not seem to be primarily racially oriented. If they believe in any form of black power at all, it's the physical energy which they are attempting to harness in the black community and the economic power which, they believe, will come through constructive uses of that energy. If they hold any political philosophy at all, it is truly a grass roots one: they want to wrest control of their community not

so much from the power structure as from the control of an older generation of blacks. They have a large number of the young people; now they are attempting to expand their source of energy by moving into the black, middle-class neighborhoods. And it is in such areas that the limitations of the Ranger appeal are tested. It is within these areas that class lines become more apparent.

Abner Mikva admits the reality of these class lines which contribute to polarization in the black community. "In other neighborhoods they really are recruiting, but these are different kinds of kids. They're middle-class, with two parents in the home—home-owning parents—not kids from broken families. The Rangers are scaring the daylights out of them. And unfortunately, some of the white churchmen are helping them. I get violent mail, more from the black community than from the white, asking: 'What are you doing defending the Rangers?'

"Some people in the South Woodlawn and Oakland areas would say that the police are too easy on the Rangers," he observes. "Some parents believe that they should crack some skulls. They're scared to death. And these are black people. This shows that it's not so much a color thing between the police and the Rangers. I can't recall any time over the last two years when I saw two white policemen alone in a car in the community. They're mostly black and white teams now. Or, if there are two white policemen, they don't respond to street calls. A good part of the G.I.U. is black, and some of these men have done community work in Woodlawn or with Operation Breadbasket. Some of them are militant, but they're against the Rangers because they're policemen and for obeying the law." Mikva feels, however, that the police do create a problem in the black community, in spite of the sameness of color. "The police insist on using direct, terrorist, violent methods and only succeed in polarizing people. They force people like myself to come out pro-Ranger because of their tactics. I come out saying more in defense of the Rangers than I would like to. Other people come out being more anti-Ranger than they would ordinarily be."

In spite of whatever constructive things they are attempting to do, Mikva says, the Rangers are unpredictable. He recognizes that the community has to deal with them, but, he says, "If they weren't here, I wouldn't invent them."

There was a birthday party given for Joyce Green at the Black P. Stone Youth Center one Saturday night in late November. The girls brought homemade cake and potato chips, a bowl of punch, balloons, some cookies, and a few records. Fifteen or so boys, ranging in age from nine to fourteen, sat on the metal chairs against the wall, under the pictures of Marcus Garvey, Malcolm X, Muhammad Au, Martin Luther King, Du Bois, and the others, waiting for the party to start. They sat quietly, waiting for the girls to start the record player. And when the music finally began, the boys cut the lights out and proceeded to select dancing partners.

Art Richardson, director of the Center, put the lights on. One of the boys cut them off again. "The lights have to stay on, little brother," Richardson told him.

"We want them out," some of the other boys said.

Richardson motioned for all the boys to come closer to him. "If it's not worth doing in the light," he said, "then it's not worth doing at all." Then he added: "That's what Stone is all about."
The boys considered this, and when Art left the room again one of them cut the lights off. Art came back into the room, put the lights on again, and stood next to the switch. All of the boys left the Center. And after gathering the cakes and the punch and the chips and records, and after breaking all the balloons, the girls followed them.

On Sunday morning before ten o'clock the boy who had made the last effort to darken the room leaned against the locked door of the Center, waiting for it to open. I waited with him.
"Art will be here in a while," I told him.

"I don't like Art," the boy said. "He's mean."

"Do you know what he was trying to tell you last night?" I asked him.

"Yeah," he said. "I know. But nobody wants to dance with girls with the lights on. If the other guys see it, they'll talk about you."

To get out of the wind, while we waited, we went across Sixty-seventh Street to a restaurant and played records and drank Cokes. The boy's name is Danny Jackson. He is in Carl Banks's percussion class. He is fourteen, an eighth-grader, has semi processed hair, and he never smiles. He wants to be a musician because his father is a musician. He wants to finish high school and then work in a factory because his father works in a factory. He has never thought about college. He does not know much about what it means to be a Blackstone Ranger, but he knows that he is one because he is allowed to walk in and out of the Center whenever he wants. Asked why he likes being a Ranger and living in Woodlawn, he says, "Because Stone Run It!"
Youth Action, a Chicago youth organization funded by the Y.M.C.A. and the Chicago Boys' Club, opened the center on Sixty-seventh and Blackstone as an outpost early in 1968. There was a one-year lease taken on the building. Last September, according to Art Richardson, Youth Action abandoned the outpost. "In October," he says, '1 just walked in the Center off the street, pulled the desks out of the basement, and got the Stones to clean up and paint the place. Then the kids started coming in."

Richardson believes that Youth Action abandoned the outpost because it could not reach the youth in the community. I asked Richardson why he thought the Center was more successful under his direction than it was under the administration of Youth Action.

"I'm a legitimate person from the community," he replied. "They were outsiders. The most important thing in this work is understanding the needs of the community. I don't profess to be able to teach, but I do come from the community. I know the needs. If I had the resources, I would be able to get peoples who are capable of carrying out my program. I'll always welcome agency peoples to come in, and I'll always welcome their ideas, but we have to run it."
"How do you know you can run it?" I asked him.

Art nodded toward the mural of the solar system on the left side of the main room. "That's energy," he said. "It only responds to the right vibrations. It's that way in nature. An outsider comes in projecting an outside vibration, communicating over the heads of the younger, grass roots brothers. That's wrong. You have to relate to young brothers simply, give off simple vibrations. Otherwise, the little brothers will not respond energetically."

I asked him if any black, and not just Rangers, could produce the right vibrations.
"No," he said. "A lot of Afro brothers don't know how to respond on the street level. So a lot of the little brothers here don't relate to and don't respect some of the outside brothers."

When Art Richardson speaks of "universal vibrations," he seems to imply that the Ranger Nation is not necessarily organized along racial lines; and the fact that many black residents of areas in which they operate condemn their activities serves to support this assumption. Subtle, almost imperceptible class lines are slowly being drawn. And the Rangers seem to be aware of this. "The Chief [Jeff Fort] wants to have white Stones and Mexican Stones and any other kind of person who has the ability to be a Stone," Richardson told me. "He's already extended the invitation."

The directors of the Center have worked out a "Performing Arts Program," with a selected schedule of classes running from Monday through Saturday. Among the classes listed are history, job training, dancing, speeches by interested religious leaders, businessmen, teachers, and entertainers, a class in percussion, boxing, current events, and a class in the importance of education. All these classes are still on paper. So far only one class, the percussion class taught by Lamar Bell and Carl Banks, has started. The others are waiting, like the children who come in every evening, perhaps for financial backing, perhaps for the trust and the enthusiasm of the adult community to grow.

In the middle of November Art Richardson and Lamar Bell began to make plans for the Ranger Thanksgiving show, to draw the interest of the Woodlawn communiiy to the Black P. Stone

Youth Center. The floors were cleaned, spotlights were rented or borrowed, posters were distributed over the Woodlawn, Hyde Park, Oakland, and Kenwood areas. Then they went out into the black community to recruit talent.

On the Friday evening just before Thanksgiving the Blackstone Rangers presented their show. It was well attended, but the young people in the audience far outnumbered the adults. A fair contingent of whites from the university areas came, and a TV newsman also came to film the first part of the show. Some of them, the whites, looked puzzled as they tried to comprehend the significance of the mural on the left wall of the auditorium room.

All of those who had volunteered to perform kept their promise. Darlene Blackburn even put on a small fashion show of female African clothing. And although Youth Action provided the microphone and helped the Rangers transport chairs from the Saint Ambrose Church, the show, for the most part, was an independent Ranger accomplishment. Visitors to the Center were asked, but not required, to make a contribution. Raffle tickets for a Thanksgiving turkey were given in exchange for the contributions. The Rangers collected almost seventy dollars.

During the late afternoon and evening there was a steady flow of people in and out of the Center. The Rangers estimate that they had between 300 and 400 people in the Center during the event. The whites who came in the early evening left, almost in a group, when the major part of the show was over. Jeff Fort, Edward Bey, Mickey Cogwell, all in leather jackets, came with some of the other older Rangers, some of them new faces in the Center. They walked, almost nervously, back and forth between the office and the auditorium during most of the show, watching. Occasionally they conferred together at the back of the auditorium, and occasionally they called Art Richardson aside and whispered to him.

Late into the evening, the real Ranger show began.

"We want to present now some Stones who have been on nationwide television," the M. C. said.

"They've been on the Smothers Brothers. And they're here, back with us now: The Blackstone Singers!"

There were cries of Stone! Stone! from the young people in the audience. Most of the adults had already left.

"We haven't appeared much this year," the spokesman for the group began, "because of what went on in Washington, D.C., and because of what's going on with the Gang Intelligence Unit and with Uncle Toms and Aunt Sallys. And because of what Stones are like in the newspapers and radio and TV. We have not appeared."

The young people, who had been noisy all through the performance of a progressive jazz group some five or six minutes before, were silent as the spokesman finished his introduction. Then there were again cries of "Stone! Stone! Stone Run It!" And after the voices had subsided, the spokesman for the Blackstone Singers made the observation that: "They're in trouble, but we're together because Stone is going to run it!" Then he announced their first song, a variation of an old Temptations piece, rewritten by the Blackstone Singers. The song was called "You're in Trouble," and they asked everyone to sing along. Everyone did. The young people in the metal chairs, in the dark room, clapped their hands in time to the music and kept yelling "Stone! Stone!" or "Stone Run It!" during places in the song where they did not know the lyrics. The singing went on a long time.

When Jeff Fort moves around, people scatter to make connections with him. He is always moving. And when the word comes that he will eventually be at a certain place, a crowd of people—Rangers and non-Rangers alike—gather at that point to wait for him. He never arrives on time, but everyone waits. And when he does come, all activities and conversations and eyes stop moving and focus on him. Jeff Fort is a man completely aware of himself, and of what he represents. He is playful, full of laughter and good humor with his men. But there is a tenseness and a seriousness behind it all, and his men seem to guard their laughter and movements when he is about. It is obvious that each Ranger has great respect for him. Even the small boys, the "peewees," imitate his hairstyle and the way he walks.

Fort may call a single man aside to converse in secret, but one is aware that, somehow, he is always conscious of the movements of everyone else in the room. He had been aware of me, of my movements in and out of the Center, for over four months. It was necessary to have his permission to talk with the Rangers. Then, when the talking was done and the Rangers who had spoken had read in type what they had said to me, I waited, patiently like the others in the Center, for Jeff to give me a few minutes of his time.

"What future plans have you made for the Nation?" I asked him when he walked close to me.
"Did you rap to him, Bop?" he said to Lamar Bell:

"Yeah, Chief," Bell said.

"How is it?"

"It's cool, Chief."


"You got everything I have to say," Jeff said to me.

Perhaps one of the few white men who can claim to have some close associations with the Blackstone Rangers is Charles Lapaglia, the youth worker whom McClellan called to testify to certain allegations made against him and the First Presbyterian Church where he is employed. He lives in Hyde Park and is planning to write a book about the Ranger Nation. Lapaglia is not an easy man to talk to because, like Reverend Fry, he has been subjected to adverse publicity and is suspicious of people who take notes of what he says. But when he begins to talk, he can relate a wealth of detail about the Rangers.

On Christmas Eve, in his home on Kimbark Street, Charles Lapaglia begins to talk. He is frequently interrupted by telephone calls from merchants who have unsold Christmas trees they want the Rangers to distribute in the area. He allows me to read something about the Gang Intelligence Unit he has written. "For both black militants and police," the paper states, the issue of who runs it [the black community] is both conscious and immediate.

Traditionally, the black community has been controlled by white institutions who disguise the oppressive methods of control by their own institutional rhetoric. The black community has seen through the rhetoric and is attempting to escape oppression by those institutions by asserting their will to determine their own destiny. The order establishing the G.I.U. is the establishment's response to the black community's attempt to gain control of their own destiny. It gives the G.I.U. the direct authority to exercise political control in the black community. Its scope extends far beyond the generally accepted police functions of apprehending law violators. Nor is the intent primarily to control violence through aggressive police action. Its purpose is to maintain tight control over a potentially rebellious colony, and to eliminate all significant opposition. The order deals directly with who runs it. It gives the G.I.U. the power to determine what is good and bad for the community—what services should be subverted—what laws are to be enforced and what laws are to be ignored—what groups should exist and what groups should be destroyed.
Lapaglia claims that the alleged "raid" on the First Presbyterian Church and the firing of guns in the church vault by members of the G.I.U. were a publicity stunt. He maintains that the Treasury Department had asked the church to act as a repository for the Ranger weapons when. it began its attempt, after the riots in the summer of 1966, to decrease the level of gun ownership in ghettos all over the country. "In that gun affair," he says, "we were actually a third party in gun-collection activities between the police and the Treasury Department and the Rangers."

A few of the older Rangers hang around the Black P. Stone Youth Center. There are no children. Lamar Bell is there. He is upset because, he says, since the first of December, just after the Thanksgiving show, policemen from the Gang Intelligence Unit have come into the

Center at least six times. He says that they park in front of the building from time to time—four men in a car—or else they come in, searching for young boys or for certain of the Main leaders. Bell is worried about the new pop machine which the Center has acquired since the Thanksgiving show, and he says that the policemen have questioned him about it. Bell wants to go to Syracuse, New York, during the Christmas holidays to work with a band there and earn money, but he is reluctant to leave Carl Banks, who is not a union musician and who therefore cannot work with him. Jeff Fort is at home with his wife and two children on Christmas Eve. Some of the other Rangers are said to be out delivering baskets to the poor.

"They are quiet passing out Christmas baskets now," Marshall Patner told me. "At one time it was a famous thing. They solicited funds last year with a card that said 'Please Give to the Christmas Fund: Blackstone Rangers.' Some of them were arrested on an 1890 ordinance saying you can't solicit funds without disclosing the name of the organization. Their lawyer argued that signing 'Blackstone Rangers' was sufficient; The case was dismissed.

"In some areas the Rangers don't even want to take credit for the good that they do," Patner said. "They worry that it may be turned back on them."

Perhaps James Houtsma, a white, former Gang Intelligence Unit detective who gave damaging testimony against the Blackstone Rangers in Washington, was close to accurate in his assessment of the present dilemma of the group. "A lot of confusion is in their minds," he observed, "because of pressures on them from their affiliation with other groups. Organizations use them as guinea pigs in experimental projects and just brought them along too fast. They started as kids, but with all the pressures, they don't even know themselves now."

But again, perhaps the Rangers are now beginning to understand what they are, or better, the potentially creative power which they represent. Early this year Jeff Fort was invited, it is said by certain Illinois politicians, to attend one of the Inaugural Balls given for President Nixon in Washington. Characteristically, Fort did not go himself, but sent two of the Main leaders to represent the Blackstone Ranger Nation. One of the two men who dressed in tails and who mingled with political dignitaries was Mickey Cogwell. While Cogwell was having "a lovely time" at the Ball (as he later told Chicago reporters), detectives from the G.I.U. came to his house in Chicago to arrest him. After returning to Chicago, Cogwell was asked why the Rangers had accepted an invitation to celebrate the election of Richard Nixon, a man, it has been said, who did not actively court the black voter.

"We elected Nixon," Cogwell stated.

"What do you mean?" he was asked. "Do you mean that your 'Don't Vote' campaign helped him to beat Humphrey in Illinois?"

"No," said Mickey Cogwell, who talks very fast. "We are the ones who put crime in the streets."

This is Saishe speaking again:

Now you have some insight as to how the gang problem got it's "foot-hold" in Chicago. The carnage Chicago is experiencing now in the year 2013 was by design beginning in the 1960's--and African-American businessmen, preachers, police, and politicians--some of whom were/are [still] a part of it. And to this day in the year 2013[they] never rallied against the [new] devastating social order created in the early 1960's in Chicago that spreaded around the nation.

I'm just sharing, and I'm ashamed, saddened, sickened, and shocked beyond belief.

Saishe!




Thursday, August 29, 2013

African-American Women's Economic Movement in USA

The Covenant:
A Paradigm Shift of Economic Behavior
Of African-American Women (Men and Children)
By Karen Sommerfield, Community/Political Activist
Chicago, IL karenks@sbcglobal.net

MISSION STATEMENT

The goal is to inspire African-American women to initiate a cohesive proactive strategy to improve the abysmal social and economic conditions that have virtually turned our communities into “killing fields.” The extreme and soaring level of poverty and despair, especially among our men and youth, demands our immediate action.

Our failure to effectively address the dangerous socio-economic issues/structures confronting us today guarantees a future for our children that will be far worse than our foremothers and forefathers ever experienced. In fact, we’re already there because our children are killing one another! How worse does it have to get before we act to help one another help our children? It cannot get any worse than our children killing us and one another.

Economic Summit of Minds
The first “question” is: Who must initiate key processes to effectively reconcile the spiraling/out-of-control economic and social devastation permeating the core of African-American’s societal existence?

The true answer: Us.

It is our responsibility to improve the ghastly social and staggering economic conditions among African-Americans, and there should be absolutely no vacillation in acknowledging our responsibility to do so. Starting right now we must collectively agree to be of “one-mind” with the same goal(s), and without further delay, develop/refine and implement “The Covenant.” Godspeed!

As women, we are definers of our destiny as demonstrated by our foremothers, and the finest among us—the economic and social engineers—who understand the complexities we face, and are quite capable of planning, implementing, and spearheading strategies to alleviate the saturating socio-economic degradation plaguing our communities must answer the “call” to step forward and take the lead in advocating and guiding our people on to a path of social tranquility and economic prosperity where our sons and daughters will and must become—in many areas—majority beneficiaries of our efforts and the billions of dollars that we contribute to America’s economy. It’s that simple.

It is our responsibility, as women, to rekindle the practices of our foremothers who courageously battled endless naysayers, oppressors, and degrading circumstances. Many of whom sacrificed their dignity and lives so that we—their descendants—could have opportunities to live far better lives than they ever imagined. We dropped the ball long time ago. But now we must pick it up and run with it so that our descendants will be granted the same opportunities provided to us through the struggles and victories of our foremothers. We must commit for the sake of our offspring, especially our sons—who desperately deserve unalienable rights to become responsible, self-reliant men who can and want to meet the challenges of supporting their families and raising their children. There should not ever be an instance where we are not willing to make that possible for them.

The Paradigm Shift of Economic Behavior
We must cease financing our economic oppression by largely changing how, where, and with/through whom we shop thereby transferring a great percentage of the “half-trillion-dollars+” we contribute to America’s economy to African-American owned businesses, [professional] service providers, and salespeople.

The second question is: How do we parlay our contributions to the economy to achieve meaningful and successful economic development, i.e., business and employment opportunities?

The only feasible answer right now is: Shifting our collective economic behavior in ways that will immediately contribute to the economic sustainment, expansion, and creation of African-American businesses, including immediately start utilizing [professional] service providers such as doctors, attorneys, accountants, tax preparers, investment advisers, insurance agents/brokers, salons, department store and car salesmen/women, lawn care/home repair contractors, etc. Only spend our money where African-Americans are employed--and when we spend our money, utilize African-American salespeople whether we are purchasing clothes, cars, appliances, homes, insurance, or whatever. Do not patronize restaurants or fast-food establishments that do not hire African-Americans--neighborhood, regional, or national chains.

A considerable portion of capital that African-American [small] business owners require to expand their products/services and create jobs can be derived via revenues generated by our consumerism—making those businesses more attractive to lending/investment institutions.

The people who own the entities where we currently spend our money enjoy the economic benefits of our patronage, i.e., create jobs for their people, ability to purchase whatever they require to live comfortably, have savings accounts, send their kids to the best schools, take vacations—all the things many of our people only dream about. We contribute handsomely to the economic upward mobility and sustainment of non-African Americans. The billions of dollars that we spend help create millions of jobs that our sons and daughters do not receive. Wake-up everybody!

We have to start making adjustments and sacrifices in every facet of our lives in order to improve the economic conditions of our people. In addition, our children mimic our economic behavior, and therefore we must change the manner in which we indoctrinate their economic behavior.

For example: Approximately 20 years ago, an Italian male Allstate insurance agent inherited my account from my African-American agent (Charles Henre' who left Allstate to join Aflac). Mr. Henre called to advise me accordingly and that he had been gone from Allstate for more than a year. He asked had I heard from his ex-partner from Allstate. Of course I had not. So I called Allstate (my home and car insurance provider) and shifted my account from the Italian agent to a female African-American Allstate agent by the name Cheryl Kirkland (now in South Holland, Illinois).

I shifted my account to her because my goal is and always will be to contribute to the economic upward mobility of my people; and Cheryl is providing jobs for African-Americans. This was a no-brainer economic decision. All of my friends and family did the same. We created a movement by successfully convincing many other African-Americans to shift there accounts to African-American agents with their insurance providers. These types of strategic economic shifts can make significant differences in the lives of millions of African-Americans who are struggling to make a living/stay in business and provide employment.

Many of us in Chicago use African-American lawn care contractors to give jobs to African-American men. It is imperative that we abandon advocating “black business/service providers are not reliable...it’s hard doing business with blacks…” Providing economic opportunities for our people should never “be hard.”

Most African-Americans around the nation use Hispanics for lawn care and home repairs—and none of them hire African-Americans. Yet far too many of us are okay with that while our sons and husbands lack jobs, and the basic requirements to sustain as a human-beings. Rather, millions of our fathers, sons, and husbands are forced into the life of vices because they lack jobs.

Daily—around the nation—our sons hopelessly drift/stand on street corners selling drugs/dodging bullets, robbing and killing us and our children—and we are burying them by the hundreds, monthly. This is maddening! Our children have an inherent right to be recipients of the wealth we generate [for others]in America. Personally, I am OUTRAGED about it. And I cannot wrap my senses around the fact that despite the fact that we spend trillions of dollars, we have hundreds-of-thousands of the most talented, intellectual, successful, audacious people in our race we simply refuse to unite to re-direct our economic strength to benefit our people. Around this very issue is where a paradigm shift must occur. We are socio-economically worse-off than any other race on earth.

Take a focused look at other races doing business in our communities, and you will recognize practiced economic indoctrinations in full play among whites, Hispanics, Koreans, Egyptians, Arabs, Indians, etc. and their refusal to hire our African-American sons and daughters. It’s happening every day throughout America—and we make it possible for them to succeed at it.

Next, take the time to visit any Hispanic community or other non-white ethnic communities, and I guarantee you will not find one African-American working in their neighborhood businesses—not one! This should be an “Aha!” moment for you, as well as a motivating factor to shift our money from them to/through us.

Again: Other races of people come from afar to open small businesses in our communities, positioning themselves to reap the receipts from our reckless-to-the-detriment-to-ourselves spending habits; and these people—99.9% of the time—do not hire from, shop or bank in our communities. Every dollar we spend with non-African-Americans leaves our communities—never to return. And what's even more disheartening than that is: We willing, with conditions take our money to them. We are the only race of people--ON EARTH-- that largely fail to indoctrinate our offspring with the concept of economically supporting our people first no matter what.

The third question is: When do we start?

The only logical answer is: Now! In order to achieve immediate and long-range economic success, we must not delay making an economic commitment to one another today. The economic paradigm shift must begin now.

Based on the economic strength of African-Americans and the combined trillons of dollars we spend, there should not be one African-American child lacking in the basics such as food, safe housing, and clothes; unemployed black men should be at a minimum; black children and young adults should be able to get jobs (summer and otherwise); black women and their families should be able to live comfortably, safely, and wherever we want to. But we are not in a position to do this, nor are we any where near being able to achieve this because despite the trillions of dollars we contribute to the wealthy living of other races of people, they do not extend the same economic considerations and opportunities to African-Americans—and neither do we.

Economics: The Institution of Racism
Among the sciences of economics and politics, which of the two sciences truly influence behavior (i.e., actions, conduct, deeds, activities, performance, manners)?

Do you know?

The answer is: Economics!

The science of economics is the primary behavior influence—no matter whose it is. Economic position or the lack there of influences what, when, where, how and how much a person, a people, a country, or any entity can do.

There are political scientists that argue the two sciences (economics and politics) are synonymous. They are not. Period!


Why do politicians spend hundreds of millions of dollars to be elected to [high] government offices?

Once again, it’s economics and the influence thereof. Politics is a paradigm by which economic factors are consigned.

What is the “driving” force of racism? Again, it’s economics.

We have spent immeasurable amounts of time being confused and upset about racism and race relations in America, not realizing there is a subtle difference between “race relations” and “racism.”

We (blacks, whites, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asians, and others) formed a coalition that elected America’s first African-American President). So improving “race relations” is no longer a “real pressing issue” for us. Mind you: It was "economic" hope that galvanized the multi-racial/multi-cultural/multi-gender coalition to elect President Obama.

Racism: We'll never be able to cure racism. It is outside of our collective "Circle of Influence," and always will be. So our time and energy would be best utilized focusing on our real "Circle of Influence," i.e., an economic paradigm shift and upward mobility.

The real issue before us now is “economics” and the development thereof—not just for African-Americans, but for America as a whole. But more importantly is whether or not we—as African-Americans—are willing to cease economic behavior that has contributed to, and in most instances, kept us at a status of “the economically disadvantaged.”

We will never be able to truly cure racism, race relations, or sustain political gains unless we effectively address/take control/address our overall economic condition(s). If we take the time to understand that economics is the foundation of racism, and racism is “driven” by others’ fear of our economic potential, we would in fact put greater emphasis on economics rather than race and politics—which would ultimately guarantee us a “place at the table--any table: Economic, Political, Social.”

Awakening of the “Sleeping Economic Giant”
We are a “Sleeping Economic Giant”--an economic transformation waiting to happen. Non-African-Americans recognize this fact far better than we do. They fear that if the “Sleeping Economic Giant” is ever awakened, and we implement a massively coordinated and indoctrinated paradigm shift our money away from "their" businesses, services to African-Americans entities and individuals, the economic impact [on them] would be nothing sort of cataclysmic. And we would witness a change in "their" behavior(s). A strategy of this magnitude would be a scary global economic proposition.

The irrefutable foundation of entrenched institutionalized, white male dominated racism is their fear of our economic potential. The greatest fear of non-African-American men is African-American men attaining and sustaining economic parity because the latter’s economic salvation would result in the others’ economic sacrifice. By-in-large, this is the motivation of covert and overt racism, which serves to especially and disproportionately exclude our fathers, sons, and husbands from employment opportunities and access to capital to start/expand/sustain businesses. The black man’s economic salvation is the white man’s economic sacrifice.

Financing Our Own Oppression
We literally finance our own oppression via how, where, and with whom we spend our money—most of which (trillions of dollars) is not spent with African-American owned businesses or through African-American professional service providers and salespeople. If we are to truly improve our economic position in a “land of prosperity,” we must change our economic behavior, i.e., how, where, and with and through whom we spend our money.

According to Target Market News, and published by Ebony Magazine (May, 2012), Black America’s Half-Trillion-Dollar Consumer Market, we spend the following dollar amounts in America on:

Category/Spent Annually (Billions)
Food: $65.2B
Apparel Products & Services $29.3B
Cars & Trucks (new and used) $29.1B
Insurance $21.3B
Telephone Services $18.6B
Household Furnishings and Equipment $16.5B
Personal Products and Services $7.4B
Housewares $1.1B
Gifts $9.6B
Computers $3.6B
Consumer Electronics $6.1B
Travel, Transportation and Lodging $6B
Education $7.5B
Healthcare $23.6 B;
Housing and Related Charges $203.8B;
Media $8.8B
Miscellaneous $8.3B
Contributions $17.3

September 19, 2013 Nielsen Update of African-Americans' spending habits; and according to "Resilient, Receptive, and Relevant: The African-American Consumer 2013 Report' forecast black buying power will rise to $1.3 trillion by 2017, finding 53 percent of the nation's 43 million blacks currently are under the age of 35, with the black population growing 40 percent faster than the general market population. The study also found that blacks watch more TV than the general population, 37 percent more; read more financial magazines, 28 percent more; and surpass the general population in smartphone ownership--71 percent verse 62 percent.

"It also found that blacks make eight more shopping trips per year than the general population; purchase nine times more ethnic beauty and grooming products; and spend more than twice the time at personal websites than any other group.

"According to the report, 81 percent of black consumers believe products advertised in black media are more relevant to them."

This validates the theory of African-Americans being a sleeping economic giant, and decisively predicates that African-Americans implement a paradigm shift in our economic behavior to uplift of people for generations to come. What is so excruciatingly hideous about where, with, and through whom we trillions of dollars is that 90+ percent of the hundreds of billions of dollars we spend is not spent with or through African-Americans.

Given the magnitude of our “buying power,” it seems logical for us to begin spending our money with and through African-Americans.

The Paradigm Shift:
Support African-American businesses, sales and professional service providers whenever possible. When purchasing big ticket items such as homes, cars, appliance/furnishings, etc. by-pass the non-African-American salesperson and seek out the African-American salesperson and contribute to that individual’s [family] economic upward mobility. This is not “rocket-science.” This is common-sense economic behavior in practice—just like all other races of people do. This is an example of shifting our economic behavior to expand/create businesses and jobs to improve our overall economic conditions.

It is imperative that we spread and indoctrinate this paradigm shift if we are to save our race and uplift "the black man"--our fathers, sons, and husbands.